Wear & Tear
One of the things I meant to do following last month's half marathon was to review the performance of the super-terrific shoes I bought back in January.

I'd meant to buy the trainers, but all they had in stock was the racing model. On the advice of the salesman, who claimed to use the racers exclusively, I went with that choice, although they were far more colorful than anything I'd normally buy.

Back in the days when New Balance was new and Nike were experimenting with waffle irons, it became a principle that the laces would be set back up away from the toes, allowing a better fit and less problems with blisters, or so they said. The Newton pinches a bit around the toes, I find, which was surprising, but in the end it didn't offer me any trouble.

The shoe does indeed encourage, even force, you to land on the forefoot. This didn't cause me much difficulty as I largely run that way anyway. But in some circumstances, such as wet roadways, where the rain interacted with the petroleum by-products lingering on the surface made things a bit slick, it sometimes felt less secure than landing more flat-footedly might have. Still, I didn't slide around all that much, so it's probably just my own insecurity interacting with Sydney drivers, who only get more aggressive as driving conditions deteriorate.

The mesh upper kept my feet pretty cool, a positive, as I'd been experiencing problems with blisters. This was more a condition of running on hot pavement in high summer than the shoes, however. Once things started to cool off a bit, it became increasingly less of an issue.

What I was especially interested in seeing was the wear. From January through May, and putting in something like an average of 20k per week, the shoes held up remarkably well, as you can see.


I'm still using this pair, but in the end, seriously debating whether to get a new set or reverting to standard issue Asics/Nike/New Balance/Addidas/whatever. The main point is that other than the gimmick of the cleats or lugs or whatever you want to call them that force your landing, there was no benefit to these shoes I couldn't get for $50+ less.

Sound (&) Vision
Glasses have long been one of the more expensive necessities of my life, and with frames starting at over $200 even before they put my expensive prescription in them, finding a way to reduce my semi-annual out-of-pocket upgrades is something of a priority. As a result, I've taken to doing my shopping on-line, where starting prices, complete, start at $100. That doesn't mean I'm not spending up big anyway, since, as I say, my prescription is for coke-bottle thick, pretty much requiring that I opt for the extras, like specialty-thin. The big trick lately, however, is that I am increasingly decrepit, needing reading glasses. I originally opted for a distance paid and a reading pair, with slightly different frames for ease of identification, and have swapped between them. I've also left my sunglasses un-upgraded, since, effectively, as medium-distance glasses, I can both read and see far enough for most purposes. But carrying extra glasses and having to juggle them seemed stupid enough in the end that I bought a pair of bifocals for this year's model.

It is very important that I keep my head still, or at any rate that I don't move my eyes in advance of moving my head, as the tilt-shift is absolutely nauseating. Walking down the hall, every irregularity in the floor seems to throw my inner ear just enough that I want to go back to two pairs. Also, I don't think the distance on these is as strong as on my pure distance-glasses. Reading's o.k. - so far.

I've heard you get used to this, but it's not a particularly pleasant period of adaptation just right now.