Reverse Cycle & Refrigeration
It’s been a while since I indulged in a culture-shock temper tantrum, but our current climatological experience prompts me to reflect on the biggest difference between life in Sydney versus back in NYC. While I was blessed on the Upper East Side with a working fireplace, in winter, in any apartment, I could rely on heat and hot water for about 99% of the season. Sometimes the boiler would go out, but that didn’t happen often and didn’t last long. Of course, in summer, without an air conditioner, apartment life could be sweltering, but even at that only for a few weeks out of the season.

Alas, poor Sydney, so far from the tropics but so much closer to the other end of the temperate zone, so much more so in either respect than it cares to admit. Sure, there isn’t any snow and the roads only ice out the Blue Mountains way, but when our reverse-cycle unit gave up the ghost, our unit became a defacto icebox, despite highs approaching 20 degrees (68 Fahrenheit) during the day. Partly this is because, like most Sydneysiders, we chose our unit’s aspect carefully, facing south by southeast, which keeps the flat pretty cool for more of the summer than a different orientation would provide. In winter, however, it means even less sun than the minimum we get the rest of the year. And because it seems the prevailing winds come in from the same direction, we even manage to cop a bit of wind-chill, even indoors, a situation not helped by the numerous, tall, wide windows along the face of the building.

We’re bloody freezing. My hands and feet have not been this cold in years. Going outdoors is a relief, if just to walk along the sunny side of the street. The situation isn’t helped by the air conditioning repairmen sent out by the building management company, as they appear to only work once a week, starting with a preliminary diagnosis, followed by a more substantial review, followed by wondering if they can get the part or if they might have to install an entirely new system, followed by God only knows what, because the people who come out to do this “work” then report their findings to the faceless office staff and don’t turn up again until the next stage, which we can only hope will be actually fixing the thing. Or putting in a new one – just do something! Shut up about it and fix it. It’s cold! It’s getting colder all the time. At this rate, it’ll be spring again before the system’s up and running.

Sure, it doesn’t help that the unit is more than 10 years’ old and that even the manufacturer has no record of the model number, or that in order to put in a new unit, the walls will have to be patched because nobody uses this configuration of in-wall unit anymore, adding to the repair cost and to the time necessary to complete the job.

At least we’ll have fresh new air conditioning for summer.

Tuesday Friday Cat Blogging

Even the cats can’t believe their eyes: Socceroos beat Japan!.

Consular Rights
I don't believe a word of what John Howard has to say about David Hicks. Neither do I believe that the three Guantanamo suicides were "acts of war." How the PM can sit in his office or sleep at night in the Lodge is beyond understanding. The Bush record is rife now with war crimes and Howard makes himself an accessory by doing nothing for David Hicks. He should be repatriated immediately. The Howard government would like us to believe that a trial would be underway or even completed by now, if only those pesky U.S. federal judges would stop letting him file all these appeals, but those appeals are his right under law. And now that Britain's courts have said he must be allowed to apply for UK citizenship, Bush and Howard are denying him access to British consular officials to let that happen, exacerbating their crimes. How long do we have to put up with the utter abrogation of the rule of law, the essential characteristic of our societies?

Who's a Bully?
I have no objections to Australian Workplace Agreements (AWA's) per se, and don't object to John Howard's "WorkChoices" legislation insofar as it might have been used to help make working life and keeping a job and even getting a job easier and more fair (except it wasn't), so when I first heard that opposition leader Kim Beazley had vowed to eliminate AWA's, I thought it had to be a misunderstanding, that he'd really vowed to get rid of the PM's odious legislation. Today's characterization of Beazley's promise, that he was bullied into it by the unions, is, however, childish, even stupid. While AWA's might give some employees opportunities, under the new legislation they are leverage exclusively for employers, a club to be weilded freely, and that's how Howard wants it. So under the circumstances, I'm with Bomber today. The only choice for workers presently is none, and it should have been much different. If radical surgery is all that's left, then let's get the operation underway. Working men and women fought long and hard to get the rights and responsibilities enshrined in the Awards system; we shouldn't let the present government strip it all away so easily.

Update: Tim Dunlop provides some useful information on the distinction I missed between AWA's and individual contracts, clearing up Labor's policy move and why it's the right one.

Reducing the Insurgency
It would be wrong to revel in anyone’s death, but I’m not sad, either, that al-Zarqawi is dead. Now, what can we do to make Ann Coulter shut up?

While we’re at it, for US$5.00, you, too, can submit a “memorial” to initiate the impeachment of George W. Bush. A memorial is a submission direct from the citizenry and bypassing the House. It’s fully legal, even if it was only last used in 1828, and in regard to a Federal judge. Still, on October 12, if enough of us send in our memorials, somebody might actually have to take notice.

Whining from the Sniveller
Because he’s bemoaning how he comes off over the “snivelling grub” exchange in an SMH editorial, Health Minister, Tony Abbott, gets right-of-reply, where he indulges in some public blubbering. Poor Tony, he just can’t get a break, can he? Of course, the fact that he spends most of his editorial time pointing fingers at Kim Beazley, whom he mentions 4 times before he even names Julia Gillard, the Shadow Health Minister, tells a lot more truth than any of his statistics or historical references to England’s Parliamentary behavior, the focus of the first half of his pathetic excuses: Tony Abbott acted against Kelvin Thompson derisively because as a front-bencher it’s his responsibility to play the guard dog whenever any substantive issue comes up that might impugn his beloved party or its allies. Can’t seriously question former Nationals leader John Anderson’s honesty? Tell me another, Tony, now that the AWB cat is out of the bag. This isn’t about ‘strong language’; that’s the best part of a lively Parliament. It’s about keeping government honest, something on which I question you.

On On Beauty
I’m about two-thirds through Zadie Smith’s latest, now winner of the Orange Prize, and it’s a very good book, although not, perhaps, to the same degree as her debut, White Teeth, mainly, I think, with still a good ways yet to go, from two significant factors, the main one being what I’ve found to be a lack of focus on characters, of whom there are simply too many. (The other factor is, as Ms. Smith has admitted, that the book is an homage to E. M. Forster, and reads like a up-to-dated version of Howards End, a fault I won’t fault too far, that being the only Forster I’ve read and having enjoyed it well enough at that.) The problem of encompassing the full multicultural debate, let alone whether transplanted to New England or not, is perhaps greater than any novel can manage with enough depth, so while the characters in this book present a range broad enough to accommodate the issues, the story doesn’t delve as deeply as it might into any of them. The Black/White divide, the African diaspora, the British versus American multicultural models, urban and suburban, even male-female dichotomies – whether interracial, transgenerational, or transgressive – are covered, but it’s like the difference between a wine tasting menu as opposed to selecting a particular variety with a good meal: subtle distinctions are lost to all but the connessieur. It’s still good and worth reading, and now a prize-winner. If I ever get around to >I Am Charlotte Simons, it might make an interesting counterpoint on elite university culture, too.

(Radioactive) Fuel to the Fire
As Australia starts towards its debate on the implementation of nuclear power plants, back in NYC the debate has moved on towards decommissioning Indian Point, and this raises a number of issues that must also be taken into consideration in Canberra.

While the government’s focus so far is on whether the plants are, first, economical, and second, where they can be situated, and must also consider, even if there’s been little discussion so far, where the waste can be stored, whether the plants themselves or their waste constitute a terrorist target, let alone an environmental problem, there’s also the issue of what to do with the things when they’ve outlived their usefulness.

Indian Point may produce nearly all of Westchester County’s electricity, while only 10% of the state’s requirements overall, but other, more conventional plants could produce the same or more, albeit while failing to reduce CO2 emissions. This does not, however, take into account less conventional energy production, the technologies for which not only already exist, mainly in passive forms, but which are continually being developed, especially outside the US (or Australia), such as Rebecca Blood highlighted is happening in China.

On the issue of waste, of particular note regarding Indian Point, the reactors, scheduled for closure in 2013/2015, have already produced more waste than they can store, even while the operators are looking to obtain a 20-year licensing extension. This is the kind of issue too often glossed over with pie-in-the-sky promises of a national nuclear waste dump off in a salt dome out west (or, in Australia – where? – under Uluru?), while realistically requiring much closer scrutiny.

Democracy in Action
So much for parliamentary standards. It’s pretty childish for Julia Gillard to throw Tony Abbott’s words back in his face, but for the Speaker of the House to act from his partisan preferences and bar her is despicable. David Hawker should be censured himself and forced to step down. John Howard doesn’t even need to whistle to get this guard dog to bark.

Shut Up
When is speech not free? When it’s critical of your employer, especially if you’re working for the government. Now, anyway. The dispute under examination doesn’t sound like free speech, to be fair; it sounds like a contentious dispute between an employee and his supervisors that got him a black mark on his permanent record. The “legitimate staffing needs” of the L.A. D.A. probably address what used to be called “personality conflicts,” and Mr. Ceballos is probably lucky he got to keep his job at all. Nevertheless, concerns over the chilling effect this decision may have on whistleblowers and others, even outside government service, in speaking against bad decisions or practices seems warranted. While the specifics of Mr. Ceballos’ behavior in objecting to a search warrant’s legitimacy are not provided, that he did so should be commended. A truly democratic system of government requires its operations to be transparent, above-board at all times, and, to argue for the dissent, no employee working in the government, or elsewhere for that matter, surrenders his rights or duties as a citizen in protecting the public interest in this respect. Mr. Ceballos’ objections must be protected speech or we hand our [elected] leaders more power than they are entitled to, and we know about power. But then look at which Justices were in the majority.

Broadway’s Magical Thinking
I just finished Joan Didion’s memoir, The Year of Magical Thinking (which was terrific, by the way, really, really good), but it never really struck me that it would make a good Broadway Play, even with Vanessa Redgrave. I suppose I’m wrong about this, given the calibre of the writers involved and the actress to deliver it, so I won’t offer any prognostication. The book, however, I’ll go ahead and recommend now.

Justice
While they’re in prison, maybe a couple of exercise bikes could be hooked up to the grid so they can pedal up some wattage.

Intervention
Sending the troops into East Timor to assist the government in restoring peace is a worthy action. The history of independence there has been fraught and deserves assistance. The action of the Timorese government in firing striking soldiers highlights societal problems there that must be resolved and precipitated the present events, but that won’t turn out well in a civil war, so Mr. Howard’s actions are worthy of Australia’s position in the region.

Avoiding the Next Iran-Contra Scandal
One of the principals from the last scandal now has the authority to exempt any company he likes from SEC disclosure regulations. This is Presidential-level authority, delegated for the first time, and to the author of arms-for-hostages and other Cold War era misdeeds. Who goes first? Haliburton?

(Note: the authorization was signed into effect the same day Porter Goss resigned as the head of the CIA. While the two events themselves are unconnected, the timing on Bush's part is an obvious attempt to take advantage of a bigger news event.)

Friday Cat Blogging: Tuesday Edition
We'll get this out of the way.

Theo's not so sure I'm not trying to do him harm,

but Felix has no such qualms.

Ain't they purdy?

What Else Are You Going to Do with It?
Australia has lots of uranium, so much that we're going to start exporting it to China soon, and others, maybe, later, especially now that George Bush has welcomed Pakistan into the nuclear club (but not India, go figure), at least unofficially. However, there is no nuclear energy industry here as yet, although there are those who seek to change that. A national debate over building nuclear generators? Fine, but the answers seem pretty well established already. Although we certainly need to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions, since we're not signatories to Kyoto, framing the debate on environmental principles is to base it on false pretenses. Our PM, John Howard, has said he believes the decision should be economically based, but that also seems to ring hollow. While other countries have nuclear power plants, none run at full capacity, none provide a substantial measure of overall electric power, none have been constructed or now operate without considerable government subsidy, essentially forcing the population to pay two energy bills: one from their power suppier and one to the government, who just hand it over to the power supplier. In addition, there's the issue of waste, and we're not just talking about spent fuel rods - a source of material that can be reprocessed into weapons-grade plutonium or otherwise used for destructive purposes - but also everything that goes into handling the stuff. Once your protective suit is sufficiently irradiated itself, or that pair of wire cutters, or that hammer, it's radioactive waste, and it will stay that way for decades, centuries perhaps, slowly breaking down. So it needs to be stored, and safely, not just from those who would reuse it illegitimately, but also from interacting with the environment, leeching isotopes into the water table passively, for example.

So it doesn't help move toward clean energy production, because it can't effectively replace the fossil fuels; costs far, far more; and presents a potential for harm to the environment equal to or greater than what it's supposed to replace. What's the debate?

Advancing
Today I affirm my commitment as a citizen to Australia (yes, remaining “bipolar” [who’s Hugh Morgan when he’s at home?] – a dual citizen of the U.S.), but I don’t know that I’ll ever learn the words to Advance Australia Fair, even if just the “official” words, i.e., the first and third verses, as noted on the PM’s website, let alone the bits about “gallant Cook” and “From England, Scotia, Erin’s Isle / Who come our lot to share” (leaves out the “wogs,” doesn’t it? - and, look, that’s a term of endearment here, more than one of opprobrium, so calm down [I mean, don't come the raw prawn]; it’s sort of like how you call people you’re angry with or don’t like “Mate” – with a sarcastic edge – and your mates “bastards”), and especially “Still keep a British soul.” I mean, after all, I am from a country that successfully put itself forward as a republic, unlike others of “Brittania’s sons,” one that rid itself of a monarchy and has long prided itself on its immigrant culture (even when it’s often failed to practice well what it’s preached). And you know, for a song written slightly more than 22 years before Australia become a Commonwealth, it’s probably not entirely appropriate as the national anthem, which may be why everybody sings Waltzing Matilda instead at the footy. That and it’s a better song, generally, even if it is about a sheep rustler who commits suicide instead of being taken to jail. But it’s a terrific country, one I am proud to participate in fully. I’ll get a passport (so I can indulge my Bourne Identity fantasies), and I should get some Golden Wattle to plant out on the balcony, too.

The pages referenced above also provide links to audio files, in case you want to commemorate the event yourselves or are otherwise interested in the song. (“Girt.” Who says “girt” anymore? Being an island is such an accomplishment? I need to talk to Fred Rieben - hey, look, he’s a naturalized American-Australian, too.)

(Funny how our subscription to the New Yorker should run out just as I’m becoming officially entrenched in my new society. Should I feel rejected? Well, we still [now] get the Atlantic.)

643 of 1058
I found my bib number from the Australia Day fun run in Moore Park and, nearly 4 months after the fact, finally picked up my results for the 8km: 43:42, which I’m not entirely dissatisfied with, since it’s still under 5:30 per and I’d let the holidays totally decimate my training regimen. Now that I’m immersed in my plans for the City-to-Surf in August, finding out I placed in the 60th percentile in January provides motivation towards keeping up my kilometerage.

Keep Your Friends Close
We’re not friends with Venezuela any more, but Libya, on the other hand, are buds. Why does the Bush Administration’s policy on Hugo Chavez – and it is exactly that: a policy of personal animosity – remind me so much of those old Cold War “spheres of influence” arguments, such as were previously used to install General Pinochet in Chile, for example? I’m all in favor of granting Colonel Muammar el-Qadaffi better status in the world now that he’s renounced his pursuit of weapons of mass destruction and his support for terrorism, but he’s still an evil dictator. Does his turnabout make him so different from Chavez, who now appears to be headed towards creating a dictatorship for himself, or is this just a question of who’s our dictator and who’s a rogue (or otherwise aligned: he may be a bastard, but he’s our bastard)? I seem to remember some other Middle Eastern dictator coming to grief recently after having enjoyed decades as the golden boy of the U.S. The days of real politik never ended, did they? It all just changed hands, from the old imperialists of Europe to the new hegemony of D.C. alone. I’ve criticized Bush for his Cabinet picks before: they’re all the failed Cold Warriors of previous administrations or of academia, so the rhetoric they and they’re supporters (and their ostensible boss, Bush himself) continue to spout over the changed world we now live in falls flat, flatter every day, in fact. We could have engaged Chavez and Qadaffi positively and achieved good relations and a better outcome for all. Instead, we’re playing the old games and making the same mistakes. No wonder George is Mr. 29%.

Invaders
This week I join the invaders of Australia as a naturalised citizen – just in time for National Reconciliation Week, 27 May to 3 June, commemorating the 1967 referendum eliminating constitutional clauses discriminating against indigenous Australians. The June 3 National Sorry Day culmination marks the anniversary of the High Court’s controversial Mabo decision, recognizing Native Title rights and overturning the myth of “Terra Nullis.”

It’s a pretty common practice here to begin events held on public lands with a statement to the effect of “I recognize the traditional caretakers of the land we stand upon today, the (tribe name) people.” This isn’t something I’ve encountered elsewhere, but I rather like it. It isn’t always necessary or the practice to specify which native people were the original inhabitants, due largely to the fact that there were so very many tribes all that time ago, and it can be difficult to be sure which held what region. Nevertheless, it’s a fine practice, and I wonder whether it will be indulged at my swearing-in.

Reconciliation was something that seemed inevitable, prior to 1996 and the elevation of John Howard as Prime Minister. This is a man for whom “sorry” is a seemingly a dirty word. While I understand the legal principles upon which he may base his refusal to offer an apology, they don’t appear to be the principles he actually uses in support, weasling around over issues of who did what to whom when. The PM prefers forgetting the past, a practice he and his frontbenchers employ whenever it suits them.

Citizenship will provide me a few rights I’m looking forward to, as well as responsibilities, all of which I take seriously. As an Australian citizen-to-be, I believe in Reconciliation, the inevitability of a Republic, and a future where government serves all its people equally. This is gonna be fun.

Honesty in Government
Finally, a politician willing to come out and say that the data collected for the government “Smart Card” ID will be sold, without recourse by individuals to change or prevent it. It makes sense, too, because that way, not only does the government get a new revenue stream from handing over our data to mailing list companies and direct marketers, but Coles will be able to track your purchases and turn you in to the government if you exceed the daily calorie intake established by Health Minister Tony Abbott, or Hoyts can let them know if you go see movies like Paradise Now, or ANZ Bank can inform Parliament of foreign exchange transactions. Or more likely, they can use the information to send you some junk mail.

But at least Joe Hockey’s honest about it.

Water Park
If there's one good thing about having a house full of kittens, as M. points out, it's the requirement to regale all around you with kitten stories, like how one fell into the toilet last night and in his subsequent freak-out, sent everything on the shelf above it everywhere, or how the other, not satisfied with also falling into the (other) toilet this morning and putting water all over the bathroom floor, then found himself too interested in the washing machine not to find out if it, too, was full of water, but then treated as a most excellent game of hide-and-seek: can you find me? can you find me? Eventually, yes. All lids are now down, all closet doors are now shut. What were we thinking? Never mind, eventually, when they've settled a bit more, I'll set the camera flash off at them and post Friday Cat Blogging photos.

Gridlock
I signed a petition years ago to close Central Park to traffic. Sure, now they do it. Although the Olmstead design included carriageways for the gentry to drive their four-in-hand rigs through to the benefit of each other’s fashion sense, the advent of the automobile brought a different sense to personal transportation, one not amenable to parks, unless we’re talking about drag racing or LeMans. It’s about time somebody did something about it, even if it’s just a limited restriction for a limited duration. Traffic around the park won’t be pretty while everyone works out their routes, though.

Good News: Down Unders Now Above Ground
The trapped Tasmanian miners are out at last. The news reports kept saying “two days,” “two days,” but in the end it was two weeks. So of course Webb & Russell walked out under their own power; they probably rode back up the elevator alone, too: after two weeks in a pit without a toilet or even a damp rag, I’m betting they stunk bad. These guys were very lucky, and not just because their circumstances at the time of the cave-in spared them: they also get to have a beer with the Foo Fighters.

The System Works
Now that Moussaoui believes he got a fair trial, he’d like another. Or could his motivation have something to do with where he’ll be spending the rest of his life?

Variations on Domestic Violence
It’s a serious subject, and I don’t mean to take anything away from that, but this has been four days of varying degrees of trouble, negative and positive, really. In the first place, Thursday night I’d had it with our neighbor’s incessant doof-doof party music after nine p.m. and (again) rang the cops to make a noise complaint. I feel a little bad about it now, because at about the same time the patrolman showed up, Party Girl had switched off, on her way out. The music had all been getting-in-the-mood tunes and only for the forty-five minutes it took her to complete her preparations. If I’d known, I suppose I might have endured, but that’s not something I could have known without knocking on her door to ask her to shut or turn it down, a step I’ve given up taking. All we ever hear are excuses or denials, so cops was the best obvious step. Unfortunately for her, she took it in bad part and started cursing and giving the cop attitude and, when he refused to stop writing the summons and insisted on getting her name, she started kicking and shoving him out of her door. Bad move: it’s called assaulting an officer, and he called it in. Within a minute or two, we had six or seven cops hauling her off to the station, pretty nearly carrying her off bodily while she freaked out, screaming her head off in the hall, crying, pleading, arguing, and just generally beside herself. All we wanted was a little peace and quiet for once, and if she’d just taken the ticket, she’d have made it to her party. Instead she ended up in the psych ward for an evaluation of her mental status, followed by a few hours at the station house being booked. She didn’t end up held overnight, but she’s headed for court. At least the music stopped.

After all that drama, however, we then proceeded on Saturday to inflict further violence upon our home, by adopting two six-month-old kitten brothers from the Cat Protection Society, in Newtown. One, a pretty charcoal tabby, is a scaredy cat, spending an awful lot of time behind the sofa, while the other, more outgoing, black-and-white formal-dress cat, marches around the apartment purring his head off or chasing everything within and outside immediate reach that looks like it might be a mouse, including house plants and items of furniture. My hands sting from the minor scratches and bites. At least they’re not disco fans.

No Houris for an Indeterminate Duration
If there’s one good thing about the Moussaoui verdict, it’s that he’s on his way to Florence, Colorado, a “supermax”, or “control unit” federal prison. Control unit prisons are all solitary confinement, with cells typically measuring six by eight feet, wherein the prisoner spends 22 to 23 hours of each day. There’s no congregating of any kind between prisoners, not for meals, not for work, not for religious services. USP Florence was “purpose built” as a control unit lockup to replace the one at Marion, Illinois, where the Bureau of Prisons had made it a practice to send its most difficult prisoners, those causing the most disruption to operations elsewhere in the system, and one fairly notorious for prisoner abuse. Florence is modelled on California’s Pelican Bay “Security Housing Unit,” and has as a primary feature a high level of automation to reduce direct prisoner-guard interactions. In other words, ol’ Zach’s going to spend the rest of his life in the most appropriate temporal conditions to his crimes, although with no further consideration of his evident insanity than that he won’t be executed.

Pope Gets a Taste of Tibet
Now Benedict knows how the Dalai Lama feels, sharing the experience of having China appoint a bishop for him, the way Tenzin Gyatso found himself with a new Panchen Lama in 1995. Of course, it would be more analogous if China’s latest religious appointment was a Cardinal, and one of the papal succession electors, but you get the picture. I’m betting the Vatican rolls over on this one.

What Have You Done for Me Lately?
That whacky renegade, Nationals Senator Barnaby Joyce, shows his iconoclastic side again, proposing that Australia mine Antarctica before everyone else gets in there first and takes all the gold and fish and stuff. This government is all about “show me the money.” Whatever they can get now, without any consideration for the future, is where their policies will be directed. Sell Telstra – now! Sell Medibank Private – now! Dump coal in favor of nuclear power – now! Dig up Antarctica – now! There are two rationales operating here. The first is that what’s good for business is good for the nation. The second is keeping the economy running with low inflation and low unemployment keeps the voters on-side. There’s truth in both things, but both operate ultimately in service to corporate control of government. Businesses, big businesses, are who’s being kept on-side, not the lower or middle classes, and business operates on the principle of “what have you done for me lately?” and that’s never been quite so true as it is now, where so much of any businesses revenues must be spent on shareholder return and executive compensation instead of on the business itself. So long as this government operates in service to that structure, they will sell out the future. (Maybe Joyce should start looking off-planet for commercial opportunities, unless it’s just about the fish.)

Abuse
The Bush government can’t release the Guantanamo prisoners because: (a) they’ll be abused back in their home countries, (b) they’ve been abused in Guantanamo, (c) they’ll be able to sue the U.S. government for false imprisonment, or (d) now they really are terrorists. Hint: it’s a trick question.

”Please Use the Word ‘Girt’ in a Sentence”
When I was interviewed for my citizenship application, I was helpfully provided with a copy of the list of Responsibilities and Privileges with which becoming an Australian would endow me, things like Registering to Vote and Running for Office, just to refresh my memory, since I was expected to have learned them all off by heart prior to coming in. At the interview itself, I was required to recite two from each section. (Naturally, one of the privileges I provided was the trickiest to articulate without sounding like some kind of Bali drug smuggler: If I get in trouble overseas, I have the privilege to call for diplomatic assistance – what was I thinking?) I passed anyway. Because I’m a native English speaker, I probably wouldn’t have any trouble with the rest of Andrew Robb’s citizenship test, although the spelling variations do still catch me up sometimes, despite all the English English literature I’ve read, as well as some of what I perceive to be archaic usages still in force here, mostly prepositional. I am not convinced, however, by Mr. Robb’s assertions regarding the use and purpose of the test he’s proposing.

He says it’s for “prospective migrants,” which means it isn’t a citizenship test per se at all: it’s an immigration filter. Prospective migrants who want to become citizens will indeed want to attain a level of conversational English language skills to ease their transition, if they haven’t already, while prospective migrants who don’t want citizenship or aren’t sure before they get here and have a chance to learn something about Australia other than that it’s a safe, free country, may not be so concerned for themselves, much as immigrants to America were more focussed on having their children succeed in the land of opportunity. So when Mr. Robb goes on to address the issue in the specific context of “young Australian Muslims,” his real agenda is indeed revealed, as Ameer Ali of the Federation of Islamic Councils attempts to articulate. (“Without knowing what those values are, we can’t define what those values are”? O.k., maybe there are immigrants in real need of more than basic English skills.) Going on about “sermons in English” and “homegrown imams” only highlights what’s at work in Mr. Robb’s mind. This is the kind of person who, standing in an elevator and hearing people speak a language he doesn’t understand, believes they’re speaking about him, negatively, insultingly, with hostility, maybe. He’s afraid, and he thinks if everybody’s speaking English, it’ll be easier to identify the bad eggs. In fact, he thinks the baddies won’t even bother to come to Australia if they think we’ll be able to listen in on their nefarious plans to disrupt the barbeque or cat-call women on Cronulla beaches.

A citizenship test is fine with me. You should be able to demonstrate that you are serious in your civil commitment to the country, just as much as that country should be serious in its commitment to you (Mamdouh Habib and David Hicks, anyone?). Requiring language skills commensurate with a citizen’s ability to participate in that society also makes sense. Applying a test on migrants before they get here or as a bar to entry, however, is just the White Australia policy all over again. Are we a free society or not?

Why Not?
But hasn’t Fox News in general always been the Bush Administration’s spokesmen? I’m surprised it took this long for full integration.

Learning from Rove
No, not that Rove, this one, by which I mean PM John Howard’s promise of serious consequences for ministers found to have had knowledge of the AWB kickbacks is all too reminiscent of Bush promises over the Plame leak. We’ll see. (Funny, but, that JWH should be making his promise to America. Bush didn’t make his to Australia. Makes you wonder what electorate Honest John’s playing to.)

Diplomacy Is Warfare, Now Undisguised
So much for the role of ambassadors: Donald Rumsfeld, elite Cold Warrior of a bygone era and present Secretary of Defense, has inserted the military into embassies around the world as rapid-deployment operatives to conduct manhunts and terrorist camp attacks, as well as to provide intelligence-gathering and operational planning, all without being in any way subject to the oversight of diplomatic staff and superseding the CIA. Now if I was a Latin American, Middle Eastern, or Asian nation suddenly faced with an embassy full of combat troops, I’d probably be on the phone to Washington daily, just to be sure if anything was scheduled to happen, I might be able to do something about it. Like complain. That’s all I’d be left with, after all, isn’t it, now that Rummy’s found a way to extend America’s superpower hegemony without resorting to full-scale war.

Mom-Safe Tattoos
Hey, club kids, afraid of what’ll happen when your mom finds out you got yourself all inked up forever? These tats only show up under blacklight. I particularly like the one outlining the bones of the hand, or maybe the flames. In any case, you can still be buried in a Jewish cemetery, if you’re worried about it.

Arise, Ye Workers
There have been a few well-publicised cases of unfair dismissals taking advantage of the government’s new industrial relations laws already and a few instances of the government being embarrassed into forcing some instances to be reversed, but this is only the beginning. Small businesses and franchises may find themselves having to pull their heads in a bit, at least initially, but that’s not going to last and it’s not at all true of the big companies, who’ll be better positioned to take advantage. There are plenty of ads in the paper for Human Resources specialists in the new legislation, and it’s obvious what that’s about. While office workers aren’t often members or even eligible to be, the unions are gearing up for the battles to come, and there’s a whole political party with its roots in the labor union movement. Meanwhile, head out to Hyde Park North on Sunday, 7 May at noon for the May Day International Day of Workers Rights & Peace march. Let ‘em know you want to work and your rights.

Family Dramas
There are only two points in The Squid and the Whale that bothered me, and they’re quibbles, and both come only at the end of this deeply painful and awfully funny movie: when Walt runs off to the American Museum of Natural History, he runs around the Central Park reservoir, which has its new fence up, of course, instead of the chain-link that would have been there in 1986, when the movie is set. Also, since he’s presumably travelling from Brooklyn, how hard would it have been to transfer to a subway line that would have let him out right in the basement of the museum? It isn’t always worth asking these questions, but maybe it’s my status as a New Yorker that always leads me down that path. The IMDB page also cites the movie for having Walt go in through the Hall of Biodiversity, a section not added to the museum until 2000, but that’s too fine a point even for me. Look, never mind the anachronisms and typical movie geography; this is a very good movie about a very painful situation among some truly selfish but also some purely struggling-to-be-good people.

Madcap or Mad
Is the President insane? I don’t even think he’s really as dumb as he’s often made out to be, although he’s not exactly the sharpest knife in the drawer. In fact, I think he’s of only average intelligence, not something you’d normally want for the Highest Office in the Land ™. I certainly don’t think he’s crazy, either, although his religiosity presents a bit of a problem, especially insofar as he really believes God told him to go into Iraq. In many ways, that’s the real problem isn’t it? He’s a True Believer, by which I mean he is so convinced of his faith that it overwhelms all doubts, regardless of whether they stem from matters normally within the quotidian purview of religion. Paper or plastic, Mr. President? God helps him choose. Peace or war, sir? And God provides the answer. In this state, he is beyond inquiry, beyond choice. His choice is God’s choice. At some point this does indeed become insanity, similarly to a case now being presented before the Supreme Court, testing the limits of an insanity defense. In that case, a young man suffering from schizophrenia killed a policeman he thought was an alien (although the Bush Justice Department supports Arizona’s limited definition of insanity, perhaps an ironic choice). This is a very comforting form of religious belief, but often very insidious as well. This is the kind of belief that sends people out to snipe on doctors who provide abortions, to plant bombs, or to themselves become bombs. (Is George Bush not a suicide bomber only by an accident of birth?) On a more benign level, this is the same kind of belief that sends some Holy City tourists around the bend into believing themselves the risen Christ. Stay out of Jerusalem, Mr. President, it isn’t good for your mental health. But that’s where he’s going, isn’t it? Is it democracy he wants to bring to the Middle East, or the Kingdom of Heaven? Let’s hope it’s really the former, because if it’s the latter, well, then he probably really is insane.

MP Shows Keen Grasp of Economics
I'm not sure which is sillier, reporting Peter Costello's remarks about inflation or the remarks themselves. Very good, Peter, you understand the basic principles. That must by why you're in charge of the budget. On the other hand, while he's warning us good and services prices will rise in response to the increasing price of petrol, he seems to believe this is different than businesses raising those prices as a response, which must be controlled lest we face a "wave of inflation." I guess he's relying on those industrial relations laws to keep wages from being part of the cycle. That'll fix it.

Best of Cats

We only got 5 of Bu-Bu's 10 years, but they were worth it for all of us.

When we got her, some immuno-deficiency problem had left her with a terrible itch and she’d groomed all the fur off her stomach to the point of causing lesions. Many trips to the ASPCA vet service in NYC had her periodically dosed with steroids, but that never held her long. Still, she wasn’t an unhappy cat, just itchy. Then we “transported” her to Australia, and she had to spend a month in jail without the vet support, and even then she wasn’t unhappy, just itchy and bewildered. Once we got her home, she adapted immediately and we were lucky enough to find a vet who could offer better on-going treatment. In no time at all she had a full coat and was sookier than ever, not to mention maybe a bit fatter, but for a cat on permanent house arrest, as it were (we’re in an apartment, and her previous owners had had her front claws removed, a horrible procedure that is, thankfully, illegal here), that’s pretty much inevitable. Bu-Bu was almost more dog than cat in the way she’d come when she was called, roll over, rush to greet us when we’d been out, and bring her toys to us for a game. She’d spend time grooming us, just to show she cared (she liked nothing better than to sit on the back of the couch over my head and lick my hair). Still, the itch continued, and with the periodic ingestion of prednisone and her congenital heart murmur, she was always compromised in her general health, so we always knew the day would come, sooner for her than perhaps for another cat. In retrospect, I suppose we’d been getting warnings for weeks. She wasn’t always eating well. She was having more trouble keeping herself clean. She was getting breathless. She would sit off away from us and just look uncomfortable. Things like that. Blood and urine tests showed no abnormalities, and even when her breathing seemed heavier than it ought, the vet couldn’t hear anything untoward. Until last night, when it was clear that her lungs were no longer able to get her enough air. We won’t know exactly what finally did for her, but whatever it was, it was very bad, causing her lungs to bleed and slowly choking her. We might have rushed off to the after-hours animal emergency centre and spent thousands on tests and an oxygen tent and left her overnight and into the hands of veterinary surgeons, but that would have just been cruel. She was suffering and we had to help her, so we did, and we’ll miss her terribly.

Subway Stars
Back in the '80's, there was a busker who roamed the NYC subways with his cat and a battered old saxaphone. "I'm the Man from Mars" he'd shout, "and this is Martian music." At which point he would begin to wail away on his sax, just blasting away without even the pretence of a tune. "I'll keep playing unless you give me money." And we'd all start digging out coins to get him to stop. He'd march off at the next station and reboard the train in the next car, where he would recommence his performance. I always admired the Man from Mars, although I wonder sometimes what his cat made of it all (I can't imagine it was enjoyable for it, either). Now I wonder if the Man from Mars made it to Leiden? Why not? If he made it to NYC from Mars, surely NYC to the Netherlands wouldn't be much of a trick.

Cover for Me
There’s a valid argument to be made by any senior official in any organization that delegated authority can result in actions being taken that turn out to be contrary to the obligations of the group as a whole, whether to itself or to some oversight authority, but there’s also the principle of “The buck stops here,” and that’s not one that you hear much of in government anymore. Foreign Minister Alexander Downer’s testimony before the Cole Commission amounts to the same litany of excuses Mark Vaile used yesterday, with the additional, seemingly contradictory, assertion that although it was within the purview of the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade to review the practices of AWB in its trading relations with Iraq under the oil-for-food program, DFAT had no power to investigate any allegations of wrongdoing or otherwise refer such allegations or evidence to the Federal Police. So what can DFAT do? Approve the license. What can Mr. Downer do? Nothing. It’s the job of the clerks, who were only operating as a mailbox anyway, and apparently a dead letter office at that. So what’s the point of Dolly Downer? I guess it’s just to look pretty and toss his curly locks merrily. Cute.

Grist for the Mill
The Australian Wheat Board violations of the oil-for-food sanctions program in Iraq continues to scandalize everyone but the government officials involved, with Deputy Prime Minister Mark Vaile today stepping up before the Cole commission to plead incompetence. Of his staff, that is. This is about what anyone would expect from the pack currently holding the majority. They seem adept at the I-didn’t-know, nobody-told-me excuse individually and collectively, singing the tune their master taught them. Of course, now John Howard himself is closer to having to front the inquiry, with a (confidential) written statement to be provided shortly. Not that it can be expected to help either Mr. Vaile or Mr. Downer, the Foreign Relations minister who will appear tomorrow, probably to face more severe questioning than Mr. Vaile had to contend with today, especially in light of allegations by the former managing director of the AWB, Andrew Lindberg of a meeting between himself and the simpering Dolly Downer. This mess stinks, but in the end I have my doubts as to how tainted any of Howard’s front-benchers will end up. This is a slippery bunch, and it would take more than a Royal Commission to nail them for their misdeeds, let alone their mismanagement.

Palm Sunday Peace
If you’re going to be in Parramatta on Sunday, why not join the Peace Rally in Prince Alfred Park? Right across from the Catholic cathedral (but strangely not including any Catholic presence, despite the Bishop’s office right across the street), it’s surely a good cause. Starts at 1 p.m.

Room at the Top
”Scooter, c’mon in, I’ve got something I need ya t’do for me,” the Vice President sneered through his cruelly twisted lips, looking like nothing more than an evil-minded snapping turtle’s impression of Elvis Presley.

“Yes, sir, Mr. Vice President,” the aide responded smartly.

“Now, Scooter, m’boy, this come straight from W. himself, y’unnerstand? That Wilson guy, his wife’s a problem, tryin’ a run this country like some kinda Hillary, ya know? We need a little word in the ear of the press, somebody not too sympathetic an’ all, right?”

“I know just the guy, sir,” said the aide, also considering the NY Times lapdog who’d been so useful lately in her unquestioning support for the President’s new war.

And so it happened: Valerie Plame was outed as a CIA agent is a ham-handed attempt to smear her Ambassador husband because he’d dared dispute publicly the administration’s claim that Saddam Hussein had been buying “yellowcake” uranium from Niger. Why not? Most Americans – and not to mention many others in the upper echelons of government among the so-called Coalition of the Willing and their citizens – have bought every other story peddled by these crooks and liars. So if Libby wants to claim Cheney told him Bush told him to tell the world - but not openly, of course – specially selected top secret information, maybe we should believe him now, right? The problem is, since he was lying then, how can we be sure he isn’t lying now? Perjury means nothing to these people, why should any other legal principle? Nevertheless, except for the part about Bush authorizing anything, I’m inclined to believe Libby was given an order and carried it out.

The Damage Done
It was no surprise to me to hear that the jury came back finding that Zacarias Moussaoui was “eligible” for the death penalty, even after the government screw-up on the issue, but now that the decision is to be made, I am surprised that the judge has decided the jury should be able to hear the flight recorder tapes from flight 93, the September 11 plane that crashed in Pennsylvania, preventing it from becoming a fourth weapon in the hands of the hijacker terrorists. I haven’t heard any of the evidence and haven’t followed the case in the news closely, but is it that he’s been tried as a member of that particular team, that took over flight 93? Because that’s the only way I can see for those tapes and the transcript to be evidence. Otherwise it would have to be highly inflammatory and its admission into sentencing deliberations a cause for appeal.

The Hammer Falls
Tom DeLay has taken himself out of this year’s race, admitting that he has become a liability to the GOP retaining his seat in the House as a result of the campaign funding indictment handed down last year, which previously had forced him to relinquish his position as majority leader, and despite having handily won the GOP primary. Could his prospects against the Democratic challenger, Nick Lampson, who’d been gerrymandered out of a job two years ago, have had anything to do with it? DeLay says not, leaving only the prospect of his indictment turning out to be a harder battle than he’d have time for if he’d stayed in the race or additional admonishments from Congress, something he’s experienced 3 times already.

Now if something could be done about Rick Santoro, in Pennsylvania, that’d be two strikes on the forces of evil in Congress.

Back to Govindas
Dinner and a movie for nearly the price of either is worth every cent, so we took a walk up into Darlinghurst to see Syriana at our latest favorite place to have it all. (Don’t be fooled, however, into thinking that all the reclined seating arrangements are equal; in this case we chose badly and spent the time watching the film with increasing discomfort.) Now we, like everyone else who reads or listens to reviews, had been convinced that while this was going to be a very good movie, it was also going to be very complex and hard to follow. It wasn’t, with the exception of some of the arcana of business/legal practices that weren’t exactly spelled out, and even then it wasn’t as hard as it’d been made out as. The obfuscation is deliberate, of course, as it’s part of what the film’s about in the first place: how hard it is for us, even those of us actually involved in such matters, whether as governmental regulators or legal overseers and just straight-up players, to see around every corner and into the furthest reaches of the abyssal depths we’ve allowed to be created. And while even that characterization shouldn’t entirely be taken as a negative criticism, since modernity requires complexity, this is an important part of the message: that by having made the world this way and letting things slide for the appearance of understanding, we make it impossible to improve the world. High-minded idealism, of course, but that’s no reason it should be so easily dismissed or even destroyed, and we all know that’s exactly what happens, even if it isn’t a result delivered at the end of a Cruise missile, which, if it isn’t actually happening now (per se, and leaving aside Iraq), is something that we have to acknowledge has been a method employed all too often just because American interests are threatened. Sadly, and this is a point highlighted in Syriana, the confluence of business and government is all but complete, and political exigencies are now shareholder-value driven. It’s hard to come out of this movie without bitterness, but it isn’t a cynical film at all. If anything, even if it is depressing as hell, it is meant to achieve a positive result, kind of like a smoke alarm: the house may be burning, but at least we don’t have to go down with it. If nothing else, come out of the movie acknowledging that what has happened in the Middle East (and elsewhere, Nigeria, for example) and the radicalisation of its people has roots well beyond the easily denigrated medievalism of the cultures there and the corruption of its entrenched regimes. Look at the oil fields and refineries and imagine that none of it beyond a tenuous job benefits you and imagine what that can do to your soul. Then try to imagine what perpetrating that has done to ours.

Sign, or Else
The new federal industrial relations laws went into effect, and right away some workers were presented with the option of finding a new job or signing a new agreement, and it’s only getting worse as the days go on. We haven’t even gotten to the High Court challenge, but the exploitation has begun. And what happens if the High Court invalidates the legislation? Do these workers get their jobs back? Get their old conditions back? Or will they have to go to court themselves? The entire purpose of the law is to keep wages down through turnover, just like in France, although we’re not likely to experience the kind of protests they’re getting. Small business owners may benefit initially, but maybe not for long, at least not if they are actually being unfair, something they used to have to think about before acting. Meanwhile, if you want some fun, the on-going stoush over at Tim Dunlop’s place on this topic is awesomely appalling.

Don’t Tell
I’ve been reading Post Secret every week for months now. I don’t know why, exactly, because it is often very confronting and none of the secrets revealed have any particular resonance for me personally and they’re more often really sad rather than in any way presenting a glimmer of hope for any of the correspondents, but I do it anyway. I suppose it makes me feel in a way like one of those anonymous helpline operators, where your only job is to listen just so the person calling can feel there’s someone in the world who hears them and doesn’t judge. There are many other things to be gained. I’ve learned, for example, that there is a lot more child abuse happening out there than I’d prefer to admit and that the pain of such betrayals, as well as all the other violations of trust, is very persistent. I suppose I ought to stop at some point, but the site remains compelling.

”When in Doubt, Have a Man Come Through the Door with a Gun
Other than Night Watch, which is a film I’ll be watching on my own eventually, the only notable DVD in the shop was Kiss, Kiss, Bang, Bang, and while I didn’t make a point of seeing it while it was in the theatres (for all of, what? a week?), turned out to be definitely worth watching. While everyone seemed to take particular note of Val Kilmer’s character being gay, or anyway, a gay private eye, it’s just a device for some snappy banter with Robert Downey Jr., who’s as good in this as in anything else I’ve ever seen him in. What the movie really is, however, is a very genre-referential (or “meta” in internet terms) movie, and everything works to that end, except maybe the solution to the whole mystery, which was very Agatha Christie, if you take the point made in Murder by Death that she had a habit of introducing characters and events only at the solution of the crime rather than early enough in the narrative to allow her readers to keep up with the detective. This is a Raymond Chandler story, or all of them, as noted in the subheadings introducing the days as they progress; very obvious, but still amusing. How anyone can do a contemporary Los Angeles P.I. story without Chandler can only be a rhetorical question, so Shane Black just has fun with it all the way through.

Tennis, Anyone?
I never did get around to mentioning it before, but last weekend, M. and I went with our friend, Kris, to see Woody Allen’s latest film, Match Point. At least, unlike the Allen movies immediately preceding it (well, o.k., I haven’t seen Melinda and Melinda, or anything after Small Time Crooks for that matter, but with the notable exception of Sweet and Lowdown, I’ve been pretty much willing to accept the lack of critical acclaim since Crimes and Misdemeanors as valid, based on my experience of 3 or 4 in between that I actually did see), this one’s actually good, if not as good as the ones before the great Allen slump. But that may be unkind. It may be that I’m responding to somewhat lacklustre performances from Scarlett Johansson and Jonathan Rhys-Meyers, neither of whom was at least actually bad. Or maybe it’s the writing. I think I’ve noticed Allen depending a lot on ad libs, something not even he’s been good at in a long time, and that’s definitely where I had problems with the acting, making it really a problem with the direction, right? The story’s good, though, but if M.’s right, it’s a rehash of Crimes, which I don’t remember well enough (o.k., at all) to confirm. And what is the “point”? It’s better to lose than love? No, really, I’d be interested to hear what anyone else thinks. Nevertheless, if this is representative of a return to form by Woody Allen, as so many say (and as I’d agree), then there may yet be something really terrific from him again soon.

The Price of Indecency
While some internet service providers back in the States are currently attempting to eliminate the debate on whether “information wants to be free” by charging net commerce providers for expedited service, i.e., giving Yahoo! or whomever preferential treatment of its transmissions, other than making a lot of people mad and possibly eliminating any remaining rationale for Congress to keep taxation off, the other internet debate rages on: how to protect children and other sensitive citizens from the evil content available on-line. Here in Australia, we’re lucky to have Labor leader Kim Beazley, who’s come up with a plan to filter the internet before it gets to your home. Interestingly, as pointed out in the Daily Flute, this is in large part a plan previously developed by the Liberals, in 1999. What’s that song by the Who? Meet the new boss, blah, blah, blah. Listen, Kim-o, mate, I’ve got an idea: why not let people decide they don’t want to go to porn sites all on their own? Nobody forces anyone to click any link in a Google search just because it promises nekkid pitchers of Jessica Alba or whomever. Of maybe we just let the ISP’s charge a premium to go to the brown-paper-wrapper sites?

My First Mistake . . .
was not buying all the superhero gear I’ve tracked in my ‘blog to date: the electric jacket, the flying suit, all that stuff. I could’a been Batman by now. But soon, others may pass into four-color immortality, with Stan Lee’s new venture: Who Wants to Be a Superhero, a new “reality” show (or “unscripted” television program to be slightly more accurate, especially in this case), wherein contestants submit their designs for a new comic book character, and ultimately battle it out between themselves for supremacy (and a place with the Avengers, maybe?).

Sure, Now She Tells Us
Former Supreme Court Justice Sandra O’Connor has spoken out against judge-bashing, taking particular note of Tom DeLay’s threat post-Schiavo. Would it have been wrong for a sitting judge to comment at any point in the last, say, twenty years, on the use of the term “activist judges,” commonly used by the forces of far-right reactionaryism to deride the checks and balances system that makes American democracy function and to have lasted over 200 years? It’s often difficult to combat dog-whistle politics, but O’Connor’s statements are all the more welcome for being now so desperately needed.

Reasons to Use Dylan, Part One
We caught up with our friend, George, last night up at Govinda’s, where we got dinner and a movie for what would normally be the price of either rather than both (well, nearly). You’ve got to appreciate the Krishnas for this, and no hard sell, either. Plus, you get to watch the movie reclining on these big ol’ cushions, propped up at just the right angle. They could stand an equipment upgrade, as the film was kinda cloudy and the sound a little off, but it’s hard to imagine catching a first-run film (just off: they seem to play sometime in between the last theatrical run and the video store release) so cheaply or so comfortably, and just after a first-rate meal, too, all in the one location. Meanwhile, North Country was very good, as any movie with Charlize Theron and Frances McDormand would be, ably abetted by the best performance Woody Harrelson’s put in on the big screen maybe ever and a bit role for Sissy Spacek, and perhaps especially since movies about class action lawsuits, let alone sexual harassment class actions, wouldn’t normally be expected to be any good at all. Still, Norma Rae got Sally Field an Oscar, didn’t it? Even if that didn’t help Ms. Theron, North Country’s still worth watching, if only as a reminder that since 1989, when the movie is set, we haven’t come so very far even from the days of Anita Hill, if we have at least managed to advance beyond the hideous behaviour exhibited herein. Apropos of the heading on this post, the movie makes extensive use of some really bad Dylan, insofar as there is any, although only, as near as I can figure, because it’s set in Minnesota. There’s probably better period music to use for better purposes, but I almost didn’t mind.

Legislation Choices
I'm so pleased the WorkChoices(tm) legislation was rushed through Parliament. Especially since the people who eliminated debate to make it happen now recognize that it was inadequate to their intentions, most people hate it, and the High Court's probably going to invalidate it, anyway. So now we'll have to go through the whole exercise again, and probably to even worse effect.

MPAA
We stayed off the internet as much as possible yesterday and avoided the television news, including the tedious intermittent "updates" so as to avoid any previous notice of winners in the Academy Awards, a television viewing tradition here. Jon Stewart's hosting gig promised more politics than was delivered, although George Clooney's kick-off acceptance speech seemed it would set the tone for the rest. It didn't, although up until late in the evening, when Reese Witherspoon accepted her award, it was the only speech of note in the entire night. We were surprised Brokeback didn't take more awards, or Capote, for that matter, particularly since, while it was a good film, Crash didn't seem to us to be Best Picture(tm) - maybe the idea that being set in L.A. gave it an advantage has more credibility than I would have guessed. Poor Heath, but thank goodness Dion Beebe hit the money, so somebody could take an Oscar back to Australia.

Confrontation
I hope everyone who went to John Howard's gala 10-year anniversary celebration (by the way, read "fund raiser") dressed in a burka or at least a yarmulke, hijab, turban, kippa, or whatever else non-Christian attire would provide an appropriately "confrontational" experience for the Prime Bigot.

2008
We watched the first episode of Commander in Chief last night, and it was hilarious. (Yes, some would say “Hillaryous,” but they’re trolls.) Donald Sutherland was terrific. Of course, the back story is just silly: a Republican picking a female running mate, for example, let alone one who isn’t also a Republican, and then winning office? Never happen. Even if it did, it could only happen with the support of the party, so a line-of-succession revolt seems a bit of a stretch, at least not without a backroom deal to ensure Geena Davis never took the reins or wouldn’t get the nomination down the line. (Probably they’d have to kill her, but, hey, we’re talking about Republicans, right?) Still, the rest of the show was good; certainly the First Lady gags with her husband had me nearly incapacitated with laughter. I recall this is a cable-only show back in the U.S., which is too bad. More Americans could probably do with a little mass media exposure to a woman President in advance of the 2008 elections.

Faster Than I Expected
WorkChoices is working, as reported by the Blogger on the Cast Iron Balcony. Of course it was going to happen, and I'd even seen the signs in that there was an increase in Human Resources jobs being advertised, all specifying a requirement for candidates to have industrial relations expertise, which is quite distinct from the more usual qualification of "employment relations." Still, the instance cited is mind-blowing in scale and, as noted, chuztpah. Of course, John Howard will never have to face what he's accomplished, since his next move would be into retirement. Can we put Kevin Andrews on the street soon, though? I've got an AWA I'd like him to sign.

We’re Not Coming
Of course, the Sex Pistols were always about, well, the Sex Pistols, weren’t they? And the Rock ‘n’ Roll Hall of Fame is just a joke, as are most Halls of Fame, maybe all. So it’s no big surprise that Johnny Rotten and the rest of the surviving members should refuse the invitation to attend their induction. I’d have preferred better grammar, but I still think the note (which looks like it was scrawled on a cocktail napkin) is hilarious, and perfectly in character. Now, Public Image Ltd., on the other hand. . . .

Meaning It
Just in case Australians didn’t think their country was mean enough after 10 years of Howard, his putative successor has come out swinging. So much for the “subtleties” of dog-whistle politics. Peter Costello condemns multiculturalism and claims that radicals in the Muslim community seek to impose Islamic law on Australian society, the latter charge refuted by prominent Muslims, and the former by anyone with any real understanding of multiculturalism, something Mr. Costello either lacks or suppresses in his zeal to achieve the leadership position so successfully held by the culturally divisive John Howard. This is politics at its worst, and while it would be laughable in a different climate, it’s a serious matter right now. Costello is desperate to become his party’s leader and take over the Prime Ministership for at least the last three years, and the only way he sees to manage this coup is to push the Howard line beyond even the meagre limits set by Howard himself. As a new Australian-to-be (and having taken the “test,” which consisted of naming two of my responsibilities as a citizen and two of my privileges), I’m appalled at Costello’s proposal, what amounts to establishing a second-class category of citizen, offering to strip away naturalization for anyone who fails to meet his standards. I’d agree that anyone who lies in their application should indeed see their status revoked, but there’s a point at which deportation is no longer an option, when the criminal justice system can be successfully invoked, and it’s not clear what the limit are of Costello’s proposal. It seems to be his intention to take the qualification for citizenship out well beyond the oath and into normal daily life. Multiculturalism isn’t simply a matter of “food, fashion, and religion,” as he defines it. And while the behavior of some Muslims around the world over the offensive prophet cartoons deserves condemnation and contempt, I don’t recall any riots involving Muslims in Australia other than Cronulla.

The Action Movie Weekend
Really there was only one action movie, which I’ll get to, but the immediate attention belongs to Capote, and rightly so, since, as everyone’ll be aware by this time (including many who’ve never heard of Truman Capote, like some people I spoke to just this morning – and why be surprised? He’s an American author, and one who never wrote another novel after In Cold Blood, which is about forty years old now) the hype on this picture is all true. Leave it just to Phillip Seymour Hoffman, and it’s all true, and while he’s the best of a terrific cast, the rest of the actors put in great performances, nobody hitting a wrong note throughout. It’s a slow but well-paced film and builds its characters with all the fine attention Capote brought to bear in his great book, but even more so, since William Shawn and Harper Lee get a great deal more of a look-in than I can recall from the novel. Watching Capote’s descent into alcoholism and shame is almost traumatizing, but the movie never descends into maudlin pandering explication, leaving everything up to the subtleties of the acting.

On the other hand, and probably only because I can’t ever stay away from a space opera, let alone, these days, fail to afford Joss Whedon with the benefit of the doubt, Buffy fan that I’ve been, we had to watch Serenity, the cinema adaptation of Firefly, following the t.v. show’s cancellation. While this movie failed to capture M.’s attention within the first five minutes or to engage her sympathies with any of the characters – and I can see why – it’s still an interesting movie. Often billed as a space Western, what with all the “I aims” and “reckoning” being slung around in lazy drawls with the same panache as six guns are fast-drawn and fired, it is, I think, much more specific than that: it’s a x-century transposed Reconstruction era Western. Well, that’s obvious, since it involves a group of irregulars from the losing side still making forays into frontier territory following the conclusion of a vast, violent, and debilitating civil war, generally dissatisfied with the fate of their efforts at independence from an overbearing central government. It probably wouldn’t do to take the analogies too far, but they’re still pretty obvious and Whedon is very clearly exploring the same themes as Clint Eastwood has in The Outlaw Josey Wales, if not Unforgiven. It might have been pushing too hard for him to get into Faulkner territory, but the option for the film to head towards a franchise of sequels might still offer opportunity to range across that great American theme. Don’t hold your breath; there are excellent reasons for not going there, notably the example of late episodes of the early Star Trek the earnestness of which are still cringe-inducing. All up, though, it’s too easy to dismiss this movie for its surface violence and smaller points of improbabilities. There is a larger theme, as there was in Buffy, although it may be somewhat bigger than Whedon’s palette is capable of just yet. However, what he does do better with, although perhaps not as well as might be hoped for, is the look and feel elements, those things that made the Millenium Falcon segments of the Star Wars movies the more entertaining science fiction components therein. So characters: sketchy. Plot: big. Picture: nicely imagined. It's a B+ B-movie, and that's probably enough.

Oi, Oi, Oi
Coming back up Crown Street Sunday morning, I ran into the designer of the flag represented below, a proposal to replace the traditional Aussie Union Jack design, and one that I think is a big improvement, colorful and outside the standard stripes/rectangles more usually seen. Having successfully passed my examination to become a citizen of Australia, I’ll soon get my opportunity to start throwing my vote away . . . I mean throwing my vote behind the Republican movement, and while I’m at it, perhaps behind a new flag. While the Eureka Stockade flag is nice, in a kind of retro, homemade way, it’s been too co-opted over the years by extremist right-wing groups to fly over Parliament House, and as much as I like the design of the Aboriginal flag, it doesn’t represent me, and is, in fact, designed to exclude me and any non-Aborigine. This design, on the other hand, is inclusive of native and non-native peoples, retaining the blue field and Southern Cross motif of the original “European” flag, thereby maintaining the respect and honor demanded by those who served under that banner, as well as containing an “Aboriginal” motif in the central, yellow-and-red dot “boomerang.” It’s thoughtful, a bit abstract, a bit literal, a good design overall, and would look good waving around at sporting events (perhaps the only good reason left to have a flag).

Hoo-Rah
Jarhead gets comparisons to various of the post-Vietnam antiwar movies, but most of them are too literal and so undeserved. It is an antiwar movie of its own generation. As the narrator says, every war is different. That doesn’t mean they aren’t the same, however, as is also noted. And the same is true of the films made. Jarhead is a much different movie from Three Kings or that one with Meg Ryan, Courage Under Fire, as it is from the most often (and probably most accurately, if anything can be) citied Full Metal Jacket.

Leave all that aside.

Jarhead is not just an antiwar movie. It reveals much more than the cost of war, which it does well. It reveals the anachronism of military culture, focusing on the Marines, perhaps the most anachronistic of the branches of the armed services, and in so many different ways, not least being the ground-troop focus in an era that relies so heavily on air power and the mechanized forces, but also the burdens of machismo so ingrained through the indoctrination – more psychological warfare than anything else, really, and something the Marine Corps uses to very successfully create a culture of separation from the rest of the armed forces and the society they were formed to protect – and that of being a trained warrior who never gets to exercise his skills. The latter condition remains, of course, the most poignant element of the film’s examination of military service, since everyone, eventually, must retire, resign, or otherwise find themselves separated from the unit, that operative word being of great significance. And while there is the “free speech” and “war for oil” argumentation, that’s not what the movie’s about, even in light of the current situation in Iraq, not discounting those issues. Iraq War I or Iraq War II or Vietnam or any other conflict of any size or duration, the culture of war is what’s at issue and what ends up being both the most frightening and saddest problem servicemen and women and our civilization must learn from but never seems to.

We’ll face these problems again, as the troops come home, when the war ends, and the next war ends, and the one after that. And the worst of it will be borne by the soldiers, the ones who join because they don’t know what else to do, the ones who join because they believe in what they’re going to be asked to do, the ones who join because joining is the only option they’ve got or can conceive of or just need to feel like a real person.

It’s a very affecting movie and deserves to be seen. Go see it.

Who's Your Daddy?
I don't know Glenn Greenwald, and I'd never have found his post on the new right-wing cult of personality ideology without Metafilter, but that's not the point. The point is, Greenwald's dead-on here, nailing these conservative so-called pundits' colors to the mast for all to see and clearly understand. I've been reading (much) lesser versions in the comments threads over at Road to Surfdom and Larvatus Prodeo, where Bush supporters weigh in regularly with violent and nearly insensible screeds in support of concentration camps and prisoner abuse and wiretaps and every other violation of national and international standards and laws regarding civil liberties and the conduct of war. And the first thing that comes to mind is that they sound like they take their marching orders from Dick Cheney and Karl Rove. (Worse, they'd be proud to accept that characterization.) There is a new conservatism in America and elsewhere that hates everyone who isn't them and fears everyone who criticizes them and wants Bush to make it better. James Wolcott calls them "bedwetters." I do, too.

Cat Lassie
Everybody knows Inspector Rex, right? (O.k., no; so: he’s a crime-fighting dog working with the police and smarter than all the humans in the show put together, especially the guy with the bad haircut.) Well, meet Commissioner Kitty. Really, Lawrence Block could have written this story, assuming he turned to a different class of detective story and the cat had a drinking problem.

Baracking for Reform
John McCain is the wrong guy to look up to when it comes to lobbying reform, mostly because it involves money, something he’s got trouble turning down, but you’ve got to love Barack Obama’s zeal and the Democratic Party’s proposal for an independent commission, perhaps especially since it gets up McCain’s nose. It is, however, rarely a good idea to rush through legislation, even when the need, as in this case was revealed with the Abramoff crash-and-burn, is so patently obvious. Total travel ban or partial? 60-vote requirement on “earmarks” or no vote? Whatever else happens, one thing is clear: the now-public spat between Senators McCain and Obama is just the Arizonan’s ego getting in the way of substantial work. Ever since the S&L crisis, McCain’s been trying to paint a fiduciary picture of himself, coming off more whited sepulchre than White House material most of the time.

RU486 Debate
Next week the House of Representatives will vote on whether the Health Minister gets to keep his discretion over pharmaceuticals or if the Therapeutic Goods Administration can use science to decide whether a drug is safe or not. While the argument that scientists would do whatever science itself demands, that’s basically saying that they have no ethics or morals of their own, and that’s just nonsense, not to mention insulting. And while Tony Abbott says he’d review individual applications for the prescription, that, too, is nonsense, since the time necessary to bring an application would exceed that required for the use of the drug, not to mention that even if such a submission were made in time, he’d only have to “think about it” for a day in order to exceed the window of opportunity. But with the Senate already on board, perhaps this is soon to become a non-issue? About time, but a little too late, as far as how the issue has been framed in public perception. Originally, this was the “morning after pill,” and that was a far better description of its use and intention than the “abortion pill,” as it’s been allowed to become. RU486 doesn’t trigger miscarriage per se, neither does it cause an abortion, although a D&C procedure is part of the care required for persons taking the drug. What it does do is to prevent the implantation of the egg in the uterine wall. It’s little different than an IUD, such devices themselves being little different than a condom or the Pill. For Abbott, these are all the same, as they are for many fundamentalist Christians, perhaps especially Catholics up on their doctrine, but even Rome remains focussed on abortion itself, not birth control (although the larger issues have had their encyclical moments), so reproductive health largely gets to stay a private matter between doctor and patient, not a public policy debate. To me, this is not a matter of conscience, just science. Mr. Abbott, as it’s been so wittily proclaimed, can get his “rosaries off [women’s] ovaries” and let the TGA do its job.

Who’s Fighting Terror
George Bush is claiming credit for thwarting an attack in Los Angeles in 2002, and I thank him for it, right along with thanking everyone else who was involved, like the unnamed Southeast Asian nation who actually captured and interrogated the al Qaeda operative behind the scheme. But let’s look at the mechanisms: was unrestricted electronic surveillance without warrants the key to breaking up the plot? Was it a result of information gathered in Iraq? No, it was international cooperation. Let’s keep some perspective, o.k.?

(And can somebody explain to our President that while the two words may have many of the same letters in common, “liberty” and “library” are related only insofar as there should be no infringement of one upon the other in that damned USA Patriot Act?)

Use of Force
In 2001, Congress authorized the use of force by the President in retaliating for and preventing further acts of terrorism. The resolution passed is now being used as an override to the 1978 law precluding domestic surveillance. Insofar as the NSA has used its computers to monitor thousands upon thousands of emails and other transmissions across telephone lines, it could be said that Bush’s order for them to do so was a brute force” approach, and therefore legal. That’s the best excuse I can come up with for him, not that I’m usually in that business. Nevertheless, as an American citizen, it’s my duty to support the President*, and offering stupid excuses for a man too stupid to come up with his own surely qualifies.

* Only if you’re listening to Britney Spears, of course, since it’s only convention that the “elected” leader should be accepted as President, and you still get to disagree with him and even actively oppose the stupid things he does.

The Spam Defense
The argument in Parliament over how RU-486 should be managed in Australia is headed for the ludicrous much faster than I'd have expected, even with Health Mininster Tony Abbott laying about him with every club within reach. The idea he's presenting now, that RU-486 is female Viagra, just shows how far he'll go to maintain ministerial control over this one drug, despite all rational argument. Giving the Therapeutic Drug Admininstration oversight of RU-486 doesn't seem like any reason to believe in a sudden black market for the drug; just the opposite, in fact. While the availability of Viagra over the internet is certainly clogging up the email accounts of many people, that isn't because there's no one at a ministerial or cabinet level imposing control by fiat over a therapeutic substance scientifically judged safe and effective within the limits of its intended purpose and physician-directed utilization. Abbott's getting desperate, but it's his private ideology in operation, not politics, and certainly not medicine.

Half
The AP scorecard on the State of the Union speech shows up the Bush administration for the half-truths and lies of omission it’s built on. Reduce dependence on Middle East oil, not all oil imports, not oil overall. (Yet when he refers to Iraq as a “strategic nation,” he means it’s got lots of oil. For us.) Provide health care to the poor and elderly, but only pharmaceuticals and even then miss tens of thousands, increase the number of uninsured Americans, and cut spending. Blame Congress for failing to act on proposals to save Social Security but forget to mention that no such proposal was ever actually issued in a way anyone could act on it, let alone that the ideas floated around at various sycophant-fests only addressed part of the workforce funnelling their FICA taxes into Wall Street. Progress in Iraq? Don’t mention the war. (Seriously, did he say “further decrease our troop levels”? Does he mean coalition members pulling their soldiers out? And citing what’s happened in Egypt and Palestine doesn’t inspire hope for democracy in the Middle East, which I guess is what he means when he says their democracies won’t “look like our[s].”) Katrina? Forget “stronger levees,” let alone any redevelopment money; the $85 billion is in business loans and temporary housing assistance, and the levees will only be built up as strong as they were before the hurricane. Those school programs he wants aren’t going to stop a Force-5 storm. The focus on homeland security is all wiretaps all the time and ignores FISA (although the way he puts it, it sounds like he applied for and received warrants, even though that never happened), never addresses how having 8 congresspersons in for a chat constitutes legislative oversight, and dissembles over the fact that thousands of leads forwarded by the NSA to the FBI were useless dead ends targeting entirely innocent American citizens, not “al Qaeda operatives”. The so-called No Child Left Behind act keeps turning out to be a song-and-dance number, and non-security deficit reduction is a joke with no punchline, unless you think “make the tax cuts (that benefit the rich over the poor) permanent” is funny or enjoy hearing about the billions of dollars being mishandled in Iraq, which means only that the kind of stewardship the American people might enjoy is missing, leaving the economic burden to lie more and more heavily on working people’s backs. Over 5,000 words, lots of optimism and triumphalism, stirring, surely, but empty, devoid of real meaning, because every freedom he proclaims he tramples on, every ethical principal he trumpets he violates. If the state of the Union is strong, it is so no thanks to the President.

Who Knows
In the U.S. I could often get by just showing a set of credit cards to claim my identity to some officious bureaucrat, although I doubt that’d work now, especially flying, when the airlines were already getting pretty severe about photo ID before anyone flew a plane into a building, but here I’ve got to make up what’s known as 100 points of identification. Right now, no one can present 100 points with a single piece of ID unless you’re under 18. A passport is only 70 points, as is a birth certificate (although, and rightly so, a birth certificate isn’t properly identification at all, but only, as I was once told when attempting to renew a U.S. passport, proof I was born in the country, but that’s a separate story), a driver’s license is 40. Once you get to the credit cards and so forth, you’re working with 25 points apiece. While proposals are floating around for a National ID Card (interest in which was renewed following the London bombings last July, and which continues despite the recent finding that they’d have been entirely useless in preventing the attacks, something any reasonably intelligent person would already know), the points are part of the requirements of the Privacy Laws, legislation that keeps my details from being spread around too liberally, but which also cause some troublesome interference both in extraordinary circumstances and the quotidian. So while employers must exercise great care in what data they collect and store, let alone give out, and airlines couldn’t help the government figure out who any Australians were potentially caught up in the Boxing Day Tsunami, they also make sure I’ve got to front up to a teller at the bank in order to transact anything beyond the simplest on-line transaction or send original documents through the post for authentication. Such laws are even more robust elsewhere, and what Dracula’s proposing seems meant to bring Australia up the scale as well, while allowing particular loopholes for the government. In other words, more complexity for me, less for them.

If We Could See Ourselves as Others See Us
And we can. What’s remarkable – though unsurprising – is how the negatives are denied by Americans and the positives embraced, in counterpoint to the overall trend. Sure, the agreement among Americans to “America scares me” is bound to be low (although how that’s possible with today’s Senate vote on cloture giving Alito a clear path to the Supreme Court, among other things), but look at some of the other questions, like “America is a force for good in the world” or even more “America is reaping the thorns planted by its rulers in the world,” where we’re alone in the view that we’re not. Of course, nearly everyone likes our movies, and that’s something, right? (Maybe not, since most other countries don’t regard our cultural output as something to emulate.) But meanwhile, while most people around the world seem to think al Qaeda is more dangerous than America, they also tend to agree that American military strength makes the world more dangerous rather than safer.

Maybe therapy would help.